The Society of the Future

Let us imagine the society of the future. Not the dystopian society so often portrayed in films, books, and the media. Not a world of extreme wealth and poverty, scarcity, violence, technological control and hopelessness. Let us imagine a different future: a society in which all people live in peace, prosperity and a healthy environment. A society in which humanity finally embraces a simple yet powerful principle: the goods of the Earth belong to everyone, and therefore we share them; cooperation is a more natural path than competition.

Such a future is not a utopia in the negative sense of the word. It is a possibility that we can already sense today in many ideas, movements, and efforts around the world. Yet it seems distant because we are still guided by old patterns of thought, old habits and entrenched beliefs. These teach us that life is a struggle, that the economy is a competition, that everyone must look after themselves first, and that the accumulation of wealth is a sign of success. But perhaps now is precisely the time to ask ourselves: has this mindset really brought us happiness, peace and security?

A Dignified Life for All

The society of the future would be based on a different understanding of the human being and the world. Its starting point would be that every person has the right to the basic goods necessary for a dignified life. Food, water, adequate housing, healthcare and education would not be privileges dependent on place of birth, country, wealth or market conditions, but fundamental rights of every human being.

This does not mean the same life for everyone in the sense of uniformity, as is often imposed by today’s commercially driven globalisation. On the contrary, such a society would respect the diversity of cultures, languages, customs, ways of living and spiritual paths. Equality does not mean that we are all the same or that we all possess the same wealth, but that everyone has the opportunity to live a dignified, safe and creative life. Only when basic needs are met can a person truly develop their abilities, talents and inner potential.

Work, Technology and the Common Benefit

In such a society, our understanding of work would change as well. Because of automation, robotisation, and artificial intelligence, working time could be reduced. People might work three days a week, while devoting the rest of their time to education, culture, sport, family, volunteering, creativity, spirituality, or simply rest. Work would no longer be primarily a means of survival, but a contribution to the community and a form of personal expression.

Today, we often fear that technology will take our jobs. But the real question is not whether technology will replace part of human work, but to whom the fruits of this progress will belong. If the benefits of automation and robotisation belong only to the owners of capital and a small group of the richest, technology will further deepen inequality. If, however, we understand them as a common achievement of humanity, since they are based on the knowledge, skills and experience of many generations, they can become the foundation for shorter working hours, better public services and a higher quality of life for all.

Democracy, Enterprises and Public Services

In the society of the future, our understanding of democracy would change as well. It would no longer be based primarily on a deep left-right divide, which often separates people and reduces the space for cooperation and long-term planning. Democracy should be based on responsibility, knowledge, experience and service to the common good. Candidates for political office and leadership positions should undergo a thorough pre-selection process that considers their expertise, education, experience, knowledge, prior contributions to society, ethical integrity, absence of criminal convictions, and ability to cooperate. Leading a community should not be a reward for ambition, visibility, or membership in a particular political party, but rather a responsible task entrusted to people who have shown they can act for the good of the whole.

Similarly, enterprise governance should also become more democratic. Companies would no longer be understood merely as private property intended to generate profit for their owners, but as an important part of the wider community. Therefore, employees, the local community and, where appropriate, the state should also have a greater role in their ownership and governance. Representatives of employees, owners, the local community, users or consumers, and the public interest could also participate in making key decisions within companies. Such an arrangement would prevent arbitrary decision-making, encourage accountability toward people and the environment, and ensure that companies serve the life of the community and invest in it, rather than merely accumulate profits.

With such an understanding of the economy, public services, which are the foundation of a dignified life, would also be strengthened. Healthcare, education, kindergartens, and care for the elderly should not depend on an individual’s wealth, the profitability of the market, or austerity measures, but should be universally accessible, of high quality, and well funded. These are not costs that burden society but rather common investments in health, knowledge, security, solidarity, and the future of all generations. A large share of workers who would no longer be needed in the manufacturing sector due to automation and robotisation could be redirected to these activities, where human closeness, care, compassion, and responsibility cannot be replaced by machines.

Cities, Security and Shared Life

The cities of the future would also be designed around people, not cars, profit and endless consumption. Public transport would be accessible, high-quality and free. Streets would be greener, safer, and friendlier for pedestrians, children, the elderly, and people with disabilities. Energy would come from clean sources. Housing policy would follow people’s needs, not market speculation and the spread of tourist accommodation. Cities would not merely be places of work and shopping but spaces for meeting, culture, learning, and shared life.

Security, too, should be understood more broadly. Security is not only the absence of crime or war. Security also means that a person knows they will not be hungry tomorrow; that illness will not push them into poverty; that a child can go to school; that an elderly person is not abandoned; that the community takes care of those in distress. In the narrower, conventional sense, police forces would ensure people’s safety within countries, while international security would be guaranteed by strengthened, truly shared United Nations forces. War would no longer be an acceptable means of resolving disputes.

The United Nations would become a true centre of global cooperation. Not as a global government, but as a forum in which all countries have a voice and can participate in achieving the common goals of humanity: the well-being of all people, the protection of the global environment, security and peace.

The Environment as Humanity’s Common Concern

In the society of the future, the environment would be understood as humanity’s common concern. Forests, the atmosphere, oceans, rivers, lakes, groundwater and fertile soil would not be treated primarily as economic resources to be exploited, but as the foundations of life on Earth. Their protection would not be left to individual countries, market interests or short-term political decisions, but would become the shared responsibility of all nations.

Special care would be devoted to forests, which protect the climate, soil, water and countless forms of life. The atmosphere would be understood as a common good that no one has the right to pollute to the detriment of others. Oceans would no longer be spaces of ruthless extraction, pollution and waste disposal, but a shared living environment on which the balance of the entire planet depends. Similarly, fresh water would become one of the most important common goods, for without clean water there is no health, no food, no dignified life and no peace.

Such an understanding of the environment would also transform the economy. Economic development should no longer mean the destruction of natural systems, but their restoration, protection and responsible use. Humanity should act as the guardian of the Earth, not as its owner. Only when we understand nature as our common home, and not merely as an economic resource, will we be able to speak of a truly secure and dignified future for all.

Global Sharing

One of the key foundations of such a future would be a system of global sharing of goods and resources. The world today has enough food, knowledge, technology and productive capacity for every person to live with dignity. The problem is not scarcity, but unjust distribution, selfish interests, greed and the absence of true cooperation among nations. A global system of sharing would enable surpluses of food, medicines, energy, knowledge, and other key resources to be directed to where they are lacking, especially in the event of natural disasters, droughts, floods, poor harvests, or other crises. Sharing would also take place at other levels: national, regional, local, in cities and communities. Yet global sharing is crucial to the common future of the great human family.

Such a system would not mean charity from the rich to the poor. It would mean the recognition that humanity is one community, one family, and that basic goods are the right of all. The Earth is not the property of individual states, corporations or a single generation. Its gifts are the common heritage of humanity. Common goods such as water, the atmosphere, oceans, seeds, knowledge, energy resources and technological achievements should be managed responsibly and for the benefit of all people and future generations.

Sufficiency Instead of Accumulation

At the heart of such a society would be the concept of sufficiency. Sufficiency means that at some point we can say, “We have enough.” Enough for a good life, though not necessarily for endless accumulation. Enough food, housing, security, health, education, culture, free time and human relationships. Sufficiency is not poverty, nor is it a renunciation of a good life. On the contrary, sufficiency is a condition for true prosperity, because it frees us from constant competition, comparison and fear of scarcity.

A vision of the future based on sharing and cooperation is therefore not an unrealistic utopia. It may be the most realistic response to the crises of our time. Climate change, wars, hunger, migration, inequality and social disintegration are not separate problems. They all arise from a mistaken understanding of our role in the world, of the commons and of humanity’s interdependence. If we continue to compete for resources, accumulate wealth and resolve disputes by force, we will only deepen the crises. But if we accept the principle of sharing, we will begin to heal their causes.

A Future for All

The future is not predetermined. It does not have to be dystopian. It can be more just, peaceful, creative and human. But such a future will not come about on its own. It must begin in our thinking, in our values, in politics, economics, education and everyday life. It must begin with the simple realisation that we are, first and foremost, human beings, members of one human family sharing the same planet.

That is why we may and must imagine a better future. Such a future is possible if, as humanity, we take a decisive step: from accumulation to sufficiency, from competition to cooperation, from greed to sharing. Perhaps this is where the simplest and at the same time the deepest wisdom of the future lies: the goods of the world are meant for all people. Only when we truly accept this will we be able to begin living as humanity.

Meditations on the sharing economy

1. The economy is a domain of society that must create the conditions necessary to meet everyone’s basic needs and ensure the well-being of humanity, including care for the environment. 

2. Basic human needs include food, clothing, housing, medical care, social services, and education. These are fundamental human rights. 

3. The commons of humanity is the foundation for the resources, goods, and services essential to meeting basic human needs and ensuring the well-being of humanity. They must be managed with care, responsibility, and sustainability. 

4. Commercialization, which encourages competitiveness, self-interest, greed, and complacency, dominates modern economic and social thinking. It contributes significantly to widening social disparities and deepening economic inequality. 

5. Global economic inequality lies at the heart of many interconnected crises humanity faces today, including hunger, poverty, migration, war, and the climate crisis. 

6. Sharing and cooperation stand in direct opposition to commercialization and form the foundational principles of the sharing economy. 

7. Charity cannot replace a just economic system. The sharing economy is based on justice, not charity. 

8. The sharing economy encompasses diverse sharing activities at different levels, with a particular focus on the global level. Its purpose is to meet the basic needs of all people, ensure the well-being of humanity, and protect the environment. 

9. Through the sharing economy, humanity can thrive in prosperity, mutual respect, and peace, united as one large family sharing a common home—planet Earth. 

10. The sharing economy marks the beginning of a profound inner and outer transformation of humanity, founded on right human relations. 

From the e-book: Meditations on the Sharing Economy

Above all nations is humanity

“Above all nations is humanity” is a thought associated with the British historian, political thinker and humanist Goldwin Smith (1823–1910), whose life and work were closely connected with Cornell University. Although his legacy is complex, this idea is remembered as a powerful expression of human solidarity beyond national borders. The words are carved into a stone bench in front of Goldwin Smith Hall on Cornell’s campus in the United States. The bench was given to the university by Smith in 1871, while the hall, named in his honour, was dedicated in 1906.

Its meaning is clear and timeless: above the interests of nations, states, and ideologies must stand humanity as the community of all people. It is a simple yet radical statement, emphasising that compassion, justice and responsibility towards all people must not be limited by national borders, but should form the foundation of our thinking and action.

In an age of increasingly self-centred international relations, the idea that humanity stands above all nations is crucial. Today, power and force often replace treaties, agreements and ethical principles. Although the United Nations, founded in 1945, set humanity on a course of cooperation and shared responsibility, these essential values are increasingly under threat.

The United Nations was created from the hard lessons of two world wars, which showed how national power, selfishness and the sense of superiority can lead to conflict and destruction. Today, policies that emphasise national greatness and exceptionalism risk repeating these mistakes. No nation rises above another. What matters most is our shared humanity.

Every person counts. Each is equal to every other. Everyone has the right to health, well-being, peace, justice and a healthy environment.

Today, the rise of selfishness, greed and violence threatens our common future.

Cooperation, sharing, and respect for every human being are essential for our common future, for above all nations stands humanity. We are human beings first, before we are members of any nation, state, religion, ethnic background, political group or other belief.

Sources: Nad vsemi narodi je človeštvo, Cornell Ezra Magazine, Cornell University Library Digital Collections.

Economy Is About People

When we speak about the economy, it often seems as if it is only about numbers: economic growth, inflation, income, taxes, and so on. Yet we should remember that the purpose of the economy is not numbers, indicators or growth in themselves. Its purpose is human life: people’s ability to survive and to live well.

The same is true of money. Money is not an end in itself. In essence, it represents what we can buy with it. First and foremost, this means the basic goods that enable us to survive and to live a decent life. Today, however, money is increasingly used to make even more money, especially through speculation. A large part of financial flows is therefore caught up in speculation, which mainly serves to enrich a small minority.

Economists, businesspeople and many others often say that there is no room in the economy for emotions such as compassion and love. Business, they argue, should be a matter of reason, free from unnecessary emotion. But is that really true? In reality, positive qualities such as compassion, altruism, goodwill and love are often neglected or denied in economic life, while negative forces such as greed, selfishness and envy often play a major role.

This is sometimes called “business as usual”, regardless of the human or social consequences. Yet with every economic decision, from those made by governments to those made by small companies, we should ask ourselves: what does this bring to people, to society as a whole, and to the environment? Does it bring good or harm?

This is the foundation of all human conduct. We face such questions constantly. Whether we do good or harm is always our choice, and we know our actions have consequences, whether good or bad. Why, then, do we not take this seriously when it comes to the economy?

If we produce guns, they will most likely be used. If we speculate with money, there will be a shortage of it somewhere else. If we hoard goods, they will be in short supply elsewhere. Economic decisions, whether personal, corporate or national, always have real consequences. Sometimes these consequences are very severe.

According to The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025, between 638 and 720 million people faced hunger in 2024, representing 7.8 to 8.8 per cent of the world’s population. In addition, about 2.3 billion people, or 28 per cent of the world’s population, were moderately or severely food insecure.

These are real consequences of the economic decisions made by the most developed countries and large corporations. Indirectly, they are also connected with all of us who support or maintain such an unjust system, perhaps as consumers, employees or voters.

The economy, then, is not merely a game of numbers, money and “cold” business decisions. It is always about people, their survival and well-being, and the well-being of the planet as a whole. That is why the sharing economy offers a path towards the well-being of all, and with it, towards peace and the preservation of the environment.

 

Source: FAO, IFAD, UNICEF, WFP and WHO, The State of Food Security and Nutrition in the World 2025.

Maitreya’s Priorities: Sharing as the Path to Justice and Peace

According to Share International, Maitreya’s priorities are focused on the essential needs of every human being: adequate food, housing for all, healthcare and education as universal rights, the restoration of the environment and the establishment of peace. At the heart of these priorities is a simple but far-reaching principle: a more equitable sharing of the world’s food, resources and technology. Share International summarises this message in the words attributed to Maitreya: “Without sharing there can be no justice; without justice there can be no peace; without peace there can be no future.”

This message is especially urgent today. Humanity faces a deep divide between those who have more than enough and those who lack even the basic necessities of life. Recent global data show that around 700 million people faced hunger in 2024. At the same time, billions lack access to safe water, sanitation, or adequate housing, and about 250 million children and young people remain out of school.

Share International presents this global inequality not only as a moral failure, but also as a danger to peace, social stability and the environment. A world based on competition, excessive consumption, and the blind pursuit of market forces cannot create balance or justice for all. Instead, it deepens social division, environmental destruction and insecurity.

The proposed answer is the principle of sharing. Sharing is not presented merely as charity, but as a new basis for economic life and international relations. It means recognising humanity as one family and accepting that the world’s resources should be used to meet the needs of all people, not only the interests of a privileged few.

According to Share International, Maitreya will call for a reordering of global economic priorities so that food, housing, healthcare and education become universal rights. This would also include protecting and healing the environment, and building economic systems based on sustainability and sufficiency rather than overproduction and waste.

Ultimately, Maitreya’s priorities place humanity before profit, cooperation before competition, and responsibility before indifference. The choice, as presented by Share International, is between continuing on a path of division and destruction, or accepting sharing as the foundation of a just, peaceful and sustainable civilisation.

Source: Share International, “Maitreya’s priorities.”

The Economy and Its Fundamental Task

The economy is a social field whose fundamental task is to create the conditions for meeting the basic needs of every individual and for the well-being of humanity, including care for the environment.

Just as politics is concerned with leading and organising society into a functioning whole, the economy is concerned with its material side. It creates the material conditions of life for individuals and society as a whole.

That is why politics and the economy are so important and closely connected. The life of each of us is strongly shaped by the way they function.

In a narrower sense, political and economic systems directly shape these two fields. They determine their institutions and political and economic relations.

Today’s economic system, supported by politics, creates great inequality: on the one hand, widespread poverty and hunger, and on the other, immense wealth for a small part of humanity. This inequality is one of the root causes of the world’s greatest problems: social conflicts, wars, migration, the climate crisis and more.

Political and economic systems are built by people. They therefore change in line with our values and beliefs. Of course, more powerful actors have greater influence, but it is still people who shape, accept and maintain a particular political and economic system.

This means that we can also change these systems, which is good news. The first change needed is a shift in the economic system, since it causes many of the world’s greatest problems and crises.

The economy must not be separated from human values such as compassion, care for others, solidarity, respect and, ultimately, love. We cannot simply separate it from life and say that it is merely business as usual.

We cannot be caring parents, loving partners, good friends and considerate neighbours, and then, in companies and corporations, destroy the environment, exploit people in poorer countries and undermine their economic systems through financial instruments. These things simply do not belong together.

The way we behave towards those closest to us should also guide our behaviour towards all other people, in politics, companies and other institutions. The economy should express the best in human beings, not the worst: selfishness, greed, competitiveness and hatred.

Therefore, the fundamental task of the economy can only be fulfilled through compassion, solidarity, respect for others and the capacity to express love. In practice, especially in the economic sphere, these human qualities are expressed as the sharing economy.

Maitreya: A Message for a World in Crisis

Amid widespread political, economic and social crisis, many people are seeking a new direction. Share International presents Maitreya as a response to this search, describing him as a central figure expected by several major religions under different names. 

Maitreya is not presented as the founder of a new religion, but as a teacher and guide for all people. His message, intended for everyone, calls on humanity to recognise itself as one family and to create a civilisation based on sharing, justice and global cooperation.

This message speaks directly to today’s persistent inequalities. Share International summarises Maitreya’s priorities as ensuring universal access to food, water, housing, healthcare and education, as well as the restoration of the environment.

Sharing is the central principle, not merely as charity, but as a foundation for organising human life, economics and international relations. A more just and equitable distribution of resources and technology could help humanity move towards peace, trust and balance. According to Share International, Maitreya’s role is to inspire humanity to take these steps and to create a more just and sane world for all.

Maitreya’s message is clear: humanity’s future depends on cooperation, sharing and meeting the needs of all people. It is not only a call to belief, but also a call to responsibility: to ensure that no one is deprived of life’s basic necessities and to recognise that the health of the planet and the well-being of humanity are inseparable.

Source: Share International, “Maitreya the World Teacher”